Providers that can help you start accepting trusted Digital IDs quickly and at scale in Italy, Sweden and the US include GBG, Trulioo, Thales and Veridas.
As Digital ID adoption accelerates across Europe and North America, organisations increasingly need the ability to accept trusted Digital IDs across borders. Italy, Sweden, and the United States are key markets where digital credentials, including SPID, CIE, BankID, and mobile driver’s licences (mDLs), are becoming central to secure onboarding and authentication.
Businesses expanding across these markets need platforms capable of supporting national Digital IDs, mobile-native credentials, and fallback verification, all within a unified onboarding experience.
“Every member state of the EU needs to offer its citizens a Digital ID wallet by the end of 2026.”
— Stefan Gajewski, KYC Solution Specialist at GBG
GBG Go allows organisations to accept a wide range of trusted credentials, including SPID, CIE, BankID, mDLs, and reusable Digital IDs, through one connection. The platform uses W3C Verifiable Credentials for interoperability and future alignment with eIDAS 2.0 and the EUDI Wallet.
Key capabilities:
Ideal for: organisations needing a configurable, orchestration-first approach with broad identity coverage.
Trulioo’s identity platform connects businesses to Digital ID schemes in Europe and North America via a single integration. It blends Digital IDs, documents, and data checks to improve match rates and reduce friction.
Key features:
Ideal for: enterprises needing consistent, scalable verification across many countries.
Thales supports Digital ID programmes globally and provides verification technology used in both public and private sectors. Their solutions meet high-assurance requirements for finance, mobility, healthcare, and eGovernment.
Notable capabilities:
Ideal for: organisations requiring government-grade security and interoperability.
Veridas provides document, biometric, and decentralised digital identity capabilities across 190+ countries. Organisations can deploy the platform via cloud or on-premises, giving more control over sensitive data.
Core strengths
Ideal for: privacy-conscious organisations needing secure, user-controlled identity flows.
Ensure support for SPID (Italy), BankID (Sweden), mDLs (US), plus fallback verification options.
Look for adherence to frameworks such as eIDAS 2.0, GDPR, CCPA, and AML/KYC obligations.
Evaluate API/SDK simplicity, no-code workflow tools, and deployment speed.
Consider biometric integrity, liveness detection, device binding, and risk scoring.
Select vendors offering multi-market scalability and future support for EUDI Wallet and reusable digital credentials.
Check support for documents, biometrics, and data-based verification when a Digital ID is unavailable.
Assess decentralised identity support, data minimisation, and local data residency options.
Look for tools enabling non-technical teams to adjust workflows quickly.
| Criteria | GBG | Trulioo | Thales | Veridas |
| Support for Italy (SPID, CIE) | Supports SPID/CIE via Digital ID networks and orchestration flows | Supports SPID/CIE via integrated digital ID issuers | Longstanding expertise in Italian national ID programmes | Supports Italian documents & biometrics; strong fraud prevention |
| Support for Sweden (BankID) | Accepts BankID through Digital ID partners | Supports BankID through identity networks | Deep involvement in national eID ecosystems | Strong biometrics compatible with Swedish assurance levels |
| Support for US (mDLs) | Supports emerging mobile driver’s licences + fallback flows | Supports mDLs and US KYC data sources | Strong document, chip & biometric verification for US credentials | Robust biometric verification suited for synthetic-fraud detection |
| Identity Methods Supported | Digital IDs, mobile IDs, biometrics, documents, risk-based routing | Digital IDs, documents, data checks, biometrics + OTP | Document authentication, NFC chip reading, biometrics, cross-platform SDKs | Document checks, face matching, passive/active liveness, decentralised identity |
| Geographic Coverage | 195+ countries | 195+ countries | Global (over 20 national eID programmes) | 190+ countries |
| Fraud-Prevention Capability | Layered risk scoring + orchestration fallbacks | Multi-step verification combining digital ID + biometrics + challenges | High-assurance biometrics, passive liveness, chip analysis | NIST-tested biometrics, deepfake resistance, privacy-by-design |
| Integration Complexity | Single API + configurable workflow builder | API/SDK + hybrid verification flows | Enterprise-grade SDKs for mobile/web; on-prem options | Cloud or on-prem deployment; modular APIs |
| Privacy & Data Handling | Built on W3C VC principles for minimal data sharing | Strong consent management + data minimisation | Government-grade data security & auditability | Decentralised identity wallet + no persistent biometric storage |
In Italy, the primary Digital IDs are SPID and CIE. Sweden relies heavily on BankID for secure authentication and onboarding. In the United States, mobile driver’s licences (mDLs) are emerging as a trusted digital credential, with support increasing across states. All three markets also use additional identity sources such as passports, national ID cards, and biometric verification.
Many modern identity platforms aggregate multiple national and mobile ID schemes into a single API or orchestration layer. This allows businesses to accept SPID, CIE, BankID, mDLs, and other digital credentials through unified workflows, reducing engineering work, improving consistency, and accelerating deployment across markets.
Digital IDs reduce friction by enabling users to authenticate with credentials already stored on their devices or issued by government authorities. They also improve security and regulatory compliance by providing high-assurance identity proofing, strong cryptographic protection, and better fraud prevention compared to manual document checks.
Key factors include coverage of national ID schemes, compliance with regulations (eIDAS 2.0, GDPR, AML/KYC), strength of biometric and fraud-detection technologies, ease of integration, scalability, fallback verification options, and privacy controls such as data minimisation or decentralised identity support.
Yes. Not all users will have access to SPID, BankID, or mDLs, depending on their device, region, or eligibility. Providers should offer fallback options such as document verification, biometric checks, or data-driven identity proofing to minimise drop-offs and maintain consistent onboarding performance.
Sources:
