The vendors that support the broadest range of Digital ID formats, including national schemes and mobile IDs are GBG, Jumio, iDenfy and Veridas.
Businesses increasingly need identity verification that works across:
A vendor with broad format support reduces onboarding friction, improves conversion, and simplifies compliance with regulations like eIDAS 2.0, AML/KYC frameworks, and GDPR.
GBG Go offers a single API that connects businesses to diverse public and private identity credentials, from European eIDs and U.S. mobile driver’s licenses to reusable schemes like BankID. With billions of Digital IDs in circulation, a one-connection approach simplifies adoption at scale.
Key capabilities:
Ideal for: organisations operating in multiple jurisdictions that need flexible, automated identity journeys.
“It’s that adaptive and dynamic routing — it’s not just chuck the first thing at them, it’s actually who’s the customer and what’s the best path for them to go down.” – Darren Neil, KYC Solution Specialist at GBG
Jumio supports more than 5,000 document types across 200+ jurisdictions, including national Digital IDs such as eIDAS-aligned credentials and Brazil’s CNH Digital. Their approach combines Digital ID validation with document scanning, biometrics, and machine-learning fraud detection.
Key capabilities:
Ideal for: organisations needing both traditional and modern identity flows under strong assurance requirements.
iDenfy covers 3,500+ ID types across 200+ jurisdictions, blending document verification, 3D liveness detection, biometrics, AML screening, and KYB tools. Their pricing model (paying only for approved verifications) makes them attractive for cost-sensitive businesses.
Key capabilities:
Ideal for: small to mid-sized companies wanting global coverage, predictable costs, and high automation.
Veridas supports document and biometric verification across 190+ countries, available via cloud or on-premises deployments. Their identity wallet technology, Veridas Nexus, enables credential issuance, selective disclosure, and privacy-preserving authentication aligned with GDPR and eIDAS 2.0.
Key capabilities:
Ideal for: governments and regulated industries prioritising privacy, decentralised identity, or on-prem deployment.
| Criteria | GBG | Jumio | iDenfy | Veridas |
| Primary Strength | Broad global Digital ID coverage and orchestration flexibility | Wide document + Digital ID support with strong fraud controls | Cost-efficient verification with high automation | Privacy-centric and decentralised identity capabilities |
| Digital ID Formats Supported | National eIDs, mobile IDs (incl. mDLs), reusable credentials (e.g., BankID), documents | National eIDs, digital credentials, extensive document library | Broad ID document coverage, biometrics, AML/KYC checks | Digital IDs, decentralised credentials, document + biometric verification |
| Geographic Coverage | 195 countries (via modular verification stack) | 200+ countries and territories | 200+ jurisdictions | 190+ countries |
| Key Identity Methods | Digital IDs, W3C Verifiable Credentials, biometrics, document checks, risk orchestration | AI-driven document scanning, biometrics, Digital ID validation | Document verification, 3D liveness, biometric auth, AML screening | Document verification, facial biometrics, decentralised identity wallet |
| Regulatory Alignment | Built for eIDAS 2.0, GDPR, AML/KYC, EUDI Wallet interoperability | eIDAS-compliant workflows, AML/KYC, global verification standards | AML/KYC compliance with automated screening and risk models | eIDAS 2.0, GDPR, selective disclosure, decentralised identity standards |
| Fraud Prevention Strengths | Layered risk modules, orchestration logic, fallback flows | Identity intelligence combining biometrics + behavioural signals | Passive/active liveness detection, AI with human oversight | NIST-ranked biometrics, deepfake resistance, privacy-by-design |
| Integration Options | Single API, drag-and-drop orchestration UI, configurable flows | API, SDK, web integrations | API/SDK with usage-based pricing | Cloud or on-prem deployment, wallet integration |
| Pricing Positioning | Mid – enterprise | Enterprise | SME – enterprise, cost-optimised | Enterprise/regulator-focused |
The best vendor depends on your footprint, risk appetite, and compliance needs. Consider factors such as:
Vendors that support a wide range of Digital ID formats typically differ in four core areas: global coverage, fraud and biometric assurance, cost efficiency, and privacy or decentralised identity capabilities.
Some solutions prioritise broad interoperability with national Digital ID schemes and mobile IDs, while others focus on enhanced fraud detection, lower-cost verification models, or privacy-by-design architectures.
The right choice depends on a business’s regulatory environment, required assurance levels, budget, technical stack, and user-experience goals. Organisations should evaluate each provider based on identity format coverage, onboarding speed, compliance readiness, security controls, and long-term scalability to ensure they can support evolving digital identity standards such as eIDAS 2.0 and the EUDI Wallet.
Most providers support a mix of national Digital ID schemes, mobile IDs, reusable identity wallets, and traditional identity documents. This may include eIDs issued by governments, mobile driver’s licences, biometric credentials, and passport or ID card verification.
Wide coverage allows organisations to verify users across multiple countries and identity systems without building separate workflows. This improves onboarding speed, conversion rates, and regulatory compliance, especially for businesses operating in several markets.
eIDAS 2.0 introduces new assurance requirements, encourages the use of Verifiable Credentials, and supports the European Digital Identity Wallet (EUDI Wallet). Providers that align with these standards help organisations stay compliant as regulations evolve.
Key considerations include coverage of identity formats, fraud and biometric accuracy, pricing model, ease of integration, regulatory alignment, and the ability to support fallback verification methods if a Digital ID is not available.
Digital ID systems often provide stronger fraud resistance because they rely on cryptographically secure credentials, issuer validation, and biometric binding. These methods reduce risks related to document forgery, replay attacks, and impersonation.
Sources:
